Office Location

Choose a location to review

Law Offices of Larry J. Stein locations:

Ratings & Reviews

  • 5.0/5.0

    Stellar Experience with Rosa M. Koppel. I am writing to express my gratitude for the exceptional legal assistance Rosa Koppel provided in my EEOC case. She demonstrated deep understanding of the intricacies of employment law and the ability...
    Show More

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    Hands down, Ms. Rosa M. Koppel at the Law Offices of Larry J. Stein, LLC is the most talented, thoughtful, and committed employment law attorney I have ever met. She and Mr. Stein make a truly incredible team, ensuring the client is heard,...
    Show More

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    I am in a senior management role with the Federal government. I retained the services of Ms Rosa Koppel, an attorney with the Law Offices of Larry J. Stein, L.L.C., on two separate occasions concerning employment issues relating to discrimi...
    Show More

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    Ms. Rosa is an excellent attorney. She is very knowledgeable and attentive to her clients. She is organized, flexible, timely and responsive. I could call, email or text Ms. Rosa anytime. She was up front about my case and she strategies ef...
    Show More

    — Client

  • 5.0/5.0

    I am so grateful to have been referred to Attorney Larry J Stein, Esq. His impressive breadth of knowledge and expertise in the specific field of employment law was just what I needed for my case and he championed my cause throughout the en...
    Show More

    — Client

Larry J. Stein, Esq. has been principal/owner in the The Law Offices of Larry J. Stein, L.L.C. since its founding in January 2006, representing federal and private sector employees in the full range of employment and labor matters  including: Employment Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment, Disciplinary Actions, Wrongful Termination, Whistleblower and Retaliation Claims, Sexual Harassment, Disability Discrimination, Severance Agreements/Non-compete clauses. Mr. Stein formerly was Senior Counsel in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's Litigation Division, U.S. Department of the Treasury, where he handled federal appellate, district court and administrative litigation, including highly complex employment and banking law cases. He was a Federal Government attorney for more than 30 years. Commendation from Eugene A. Ludwig, former U.S. Comptroller of the Currency, for “admirable mix of professionalism and humanity” in defending the agency in multi-year, major sexual harassment litigation. Biddle v. Rubin, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 208 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 1996). 

Mr. Stein has been a volunteer trained mediator with the Washington Field Office of the EEOC’s WISE program since 2019. In that role, he has mediated and resolved a wide range of employment disputes.

In his most significant case, Kloeckner v. Solis, 568 U.S. 41 (2012), the Supreme Court, in a unanimous ruling, established that a broader class of Federal Government employees now has access to the federal district courts to challenge their discriminatory removals from federal service.  Prior to Kloeckner, these employees had no access to federal district court on their claims of discrimination. 


Practice Areas:

Federal Labor and Employment Law, Employment Discrimination, Disability Discrimination, Hostile Work Environment, Disability Retirement, Disciplinary or Adverse Actions, Retaliation, Severance Agreements/Non-Compete Clauses

Admitted:  
Pennsylvania, 1977; District of Columbia, 1986; Virginia, 2006.

U.S. Courts of Appeals, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth; District of Columbia and Federal Circuits; U.S. Court of Federal Claims;  and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Law School: 
Washington College of Law, J.D., American University, Washington, D.C.

Cases:  
Kloeckner v. Solis, 568 U.S. 41 (2012), wherein the Supreme Court established, unanimously, that a broader class of Federal Government employees now has access to federal district court to contest their discriminatory removals from the federal service. Prior to Kloeckner, these employees had no access to federal district court on their claims of discrimination; Nguyen v. Voorthuis Opticians, Inc., 478 F.Supp.2d 56 (D.D.C. 2007); Horton v. Bank One, N.A., 387 F.3d 426 (5th Cir. 2004); Ghiglieri v. Ludwig and Commercial Nat'l Bank, 125 F.3d 97 (5th Cir.1997); Biddle v. Dep't of the Treasury, 1996 WL 14001 (N.D.Ill. 1996); American Commerce Nat'l Bank v. Clarke, 974 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1992); First Nat'l Bank of Gordon v. Dep't of the Treasury, 911 F.2d 57 (8th Cir. 1990).